tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8069167524266168953.post3714565198302255816..comments2024-01-06T17:29:55.111-05:00Comments on Way of the Woo: Spot the StupidThe skepTickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03437104069644740816noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8069167524266168953.post-66041950135773646012009-01-30T10:38:00.000-05:002009-01-30T10:38:00.000-05:00Well... the writer is sort of correct, just not so...Well... the writer is sort of correct, just not so good at getting his point across. When the last ice age <I>ended</I>, 11,700 years ago (give or take a millennium or two), there was indeed a substantial rise in sea level - because of all the melting ice! The passage should have read:<BR/><BR/><I>"The rise would be the same as that which occurred at the end of the last Ice Age 11,700 years ago, and would hit lowlying areas such as The Wash."</I><BR/><BR/>Makes more sense now, doesn't it?yunshuihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16304997933466961058noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8069167524266168953.post-67171802215047858692009-01-28T14:08:00.000-05:002009-01-28T14:08:00.000-05:00I'm not real bright, but, I read the headline and ...I'm not real bright, but, I read the headline and immediately said to myself; "Self, why would the sea level rise when more water is tied up as ice?".<BR/><BR/>I guess that I am brighter than the headline writer then aren't I?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com